Overview / 01 Evidence

We are not guessing. Europe has run this experiment before.

“Exercise on prescription” — doctors referring patients to physical activity instead of, or alongside, medication — has two decades of European results behind it. Our pilot follows a proven model; it simply brings the evidence home to the Balearics.

The model

Social prescribing & exercise referral

The international name for our idea is social prescribing. A GP identifies a patient who would benefit from activity — for blood pressure, weight, low mood, isolation — and refers them to a community programme: a gym, a walking group, resistance training. A “link worker” helps them start and stick with it.

It is mainstream policy in the UK, growing across Portugal, Germany and the Nordics, and the EU is actively funding research into it through Horizon Europe. Spain already has regional receta deportiva (sport prescription) pilots — so a Balearic programme fits an established, credible pattern rather than inventing a new one.

  • UK exercise referral schemes showed reduced blood pressure and increased activity levels across cardiovascular, mental-health and musculoskeletal patients.
  • SITLESS (4 EU countries) combined exercise referral with self-management and demonstrated cost-effectiveness.
  • Social-return studies consistently found positive returns for exercise-based programmes.
  • !
    Key design lesson: schemes of 20+ weeks delivered better outcomes and adherence than 8–12 week schemes. That is why our pilot runs 12 months, not 3.

Longer schemes work better

Indicative pattern from UK exercise-referral reviews: adherence to prescribed activity by scheme length.

8 weeks 12 weeks 16 weeks 20+ weeks Lower Best outcomes

Reviews of UK schemes found 20+ week programmes produced better health outcomes and higher adherence than 8–12 week ones; Wales’ 16-week national programme proved more cost-effective than shorter schemes.

The economics

One euro in, fifty euros saved.

A study promoted by the Generalitat de Catalunya estimated that each euro invested in physical activity yields around €50 of healthcare savings across four diseases over 10–15 years — and more once other conditions are counted. It is a Spanish figure, from a Spanish administration, which makes it the perfect anchor for a Spanish fiscal argument.

The return on a single euro

€1 invested €50 saved Healthcare savings over 10–15 years, four diseases (Generalitat de Catalunya, 2005)

What this means for our proposal

The evidence base is already strong enough to justify a pilot — and a pilot is exactly what converts “evidence from elsewhere” into “evidence from here.” A government can dismiss a UK study. It cannot dismiss twelve months of data from its own citizens in Palma and Calvià.

Answering the €90M objection

Static accounting versus the dynamic reality

The Treasury’s €90M figure assumes nothing else changes when the rate drops. The sector’s own analysis — and basic price elasticity — says three things change at once.

  • 1
    Membership grows. The national federation projects roughly 30% recovery in members lost to the price rise — each new member pays VAT, employs trainers and rents space, clawing back part of the “lost” revenue.
  • 2
    Healthcare spending falls. The Catalan €1→€50 ratio compounds over 10–15 years across cardiovascular disease, diabetes and mental health — costs carried by the same public purse that collects the VAT.
  • 3
    Productivity improves. Fewer sick days and lower absenteeism feed directly into social-security contributions — the very system the proposal aims to relieve.
  • !
    Our pilot quantifies all three locally. Membership uptake from gym partners, healthcare-use change from participant data, sick days self-declared monthly. The dossier replaces a national guess with Balearic numbers.

What Palma can do without Madrid

Levers the Govern already controls

While the national VAT case is built, the Balearic government can act immediately — and each regional measure doubles as proof of commitment when the dossier reaches Madrid.

Fiscal · regional

Autonomic IRPF deduction

Regions set their own income-tax deductions. A deduction for fitness-membership spending — as some regions already offer for other wellbeing costs — effectively refunds part of the 21% without touching VAT law.

Direct · municipal

Bono deporte (sport voucher)

Palma and Calvià can subsidise memberships for target groups — over-60s, chronic-condition referrals, low-income households — mirroring culture-voucher schemes that already exist.

Clinical · IB-Salut

Formal receta deportiva pathway

Authorise GPs to prescribe activity through the pilot’s referral route. Costs almost nothing, and converts the pilot from a project into the embryo of permanent regional policy.

Political · symbolic

Parliamentary motion (PNL)

A non-binding motion in the Parlament backing the 10% rate — precedent exists at national level — puts every Balearic party on the record before the dossier lands.

The route to Madrid

The political pathway, step by step

Step 1 · Months 0–6

Regional endorsement

Steering-committee seats for both ayuntamientos and the Govern; public launch event; PNL tabled in the Parlament. The pilot becomes politically visible before any data exists.

Step 2 · Month 6

Interim results moment

First wellbeing and activity trends published with UIB’s name on them. Media framing: “Balearic residents healthier after six months of prescribed exercise.”

Step 3 · Months 6–18

National alliance

FNEID integrates the pilot into its decade-long VAT campaign; the main parties have already signalled sympathy — one formally committed to studying the 10% restitution. Balearic data gives that commitment something concrete to act on.

Step 4 · Month 18

The dossier lands

Formal presentation to the Govern Balear: pilot results, the fiscal model, the EU court ruling, and a draft petition to the Ministry of Finance. The Govern’s month-18 review commitment (secured at Step 1) means it cannot quietly shelve it.

Step 5 · Beyond

The national ask

The 10% rate is a one-line change in the annual budget law. Budget cycles come every year — the dossier’s job is to make sure that when the political moment arrives, the evidence is sitting on the table, peer-reviewed and impossible to ignore.

The urgency

Loneliness and poor mental health are already killing at European scale.

In 2025 the WHO Commission on Social Connection published its global report: loneliness is no longer just a feeling — it is a mortality factor comparable to tobacco and obesity. Together with the cost of physical inactivity, it is the backdrop to this proposal.

0k
Annual deaths worldwide linked to loneliness — around 100 every hour (WHO Commission on Social Connection, 2025).
1 in 0
People worldwide affected by loneliness; among 13–29-year-olds, up to 1 in 5 (WHO, 2025).
0k+
Premature deaths per year preventable in the EU if the population met WHO-recommended activity levels (WHO/OECD "Step Up!" report).
0bn
Potential annual healthcare savings for EU member states — 0.6% of their health budgets (WHO/OECD).
  • Europe, the big picture: cardiovascular disease and cancer cause 54% of EU deaths; 45% of Europeans say they never exercise, and one in three falls short of the recommended minimum.
  • Loneliness harms the body: the WHO links it to higher risk of stroke, heart disease, type 2 diabetes, depression, anxiety and cognitive decline — and it doubles the risk of depression.
  • The antidote is social, not just physical: the same WHO report frames social connection as a protective factor for health and longevity — exactly what walking groups and group classes deliver.
  • Spain — loneliness: the estimated cost of loneliness in Spain was around €14 billion in 2021 — 1.17% of that year's GDP, across healthcare spending and lost productivity.
  • Spain — workplace mental health: sick leave for mental disorders reached 415,374 cases in 2024, up 176% since 2015; it is now the second-largest cause of sick leave, and 40% of Spanish workers cite work as a source of anxiety or depression (vs 29% EU average).
  • Spain — pressure on Social Security: absence through common-illness leave cost over €29.1 billion in 2024 across Social Security and employers; temporary incapacity hit a record €18.4 billion in 2025 — already the second-largest Social Security expense. The Health Ministry puts depression alone at €5 billion a year.
  • !
    Why this strengthens the pilot: group exercise attacks all three fronts at once — inactivity, loneliness and low mood. That is why we measure mental wellbeing (WHO-5, PHQ-9/GAD-7) and sick days every month: they are the numbers that connect directly to Social Security's accounts.